Chat with us, powered by LiveChat This paper was done wrong last time attached is the instructions, the grading rubric, and the work d | Max paper

This paper was done wrong last time attached is the instructions, the grading rubric, and the work done last 

Saint Leo University DBA 705 – IEE Integration PAPER RUBRIC – Name: _____________________

Scores of “Excellent” in each section serve as evidence of achieving the Saint Leo University core value of EXCELLENCE through comprehensively researched and scholarly written assignments.





Paper Content (80%)

Evidence (10%)

Score: ____%

Research presented is authoritative, compelling, scholarly (for example uses peer-reviewed journal articles), and well supported.

Research is authoritative and compelling but more professionally oriented or web-based.

Uses poor or unsupported resources.

Body Structure/Flow (15%)

Score: ____%

Main ideas and arguments clearly presented and supported in well-developed paragraphs. Excellent balance of paper sections.

Main ideas clearly presented. Inconsistent balance of paper sections.

Confusing ideas presented. Poor balance of paper sections.

Integration (55%)

Score: ____%

Determines most important points in material. Integrates numerous concepts to develop new ideas.

Discovers some important points. Combines at least two concepts. Shows some signs of integration.

Relates unimportant information. Lacks synthesis of concepts. Does not integrate, ideas, procedures, or solutions.

Content Total: _____%

Paper Style (20%)

Grammar/Spelling (5%)

Score: ____%

No errors in usage.

Few errors in usage.

Frequent errors in usage.

Paper Length (5%)

Score: ____%

Appropriate length.

Within two pages of required length.

More than two pages short.

APA Style (10%)

Score: ____%

All sources accurately documented in APA; accurate reference page; effective use of headers/sub-headers.

Some APA citation errors; references mostly accurate; ineffective headers.

Sources are not documented; numerous APA errors; no reference list or headers.

Style Total: _____%

Final Grade: _____%

IEE Paper 1 – Integrative Statement

choose a set of four peer reviewed articles along a common theme that you are interested in and Prepare a one-page integrative statement according to the instructions



Integrative Statement

Antionette M. Johnson

Saint Leo University

DBA 705: History of Applied Management Theory

Professor Gold

Assignment Due Date: November 3, 2021

Graduate Studies in Business Academic Honesty Statement

My signature entered below constitutes my pledge that all the writing in this document is my own work, except for those portions which are properly documented and cited. I understand and accept the following definition of plagiarism:

1. Plagiarism includes the literal repetition without acknowledgment of the writings of another author. All significant phrases, clauses, or passages in this paper which have been taken directly from source material have been enclosed in quotation marks and acknowledged in the text itself as well as on the Reference page.

2. Plagiarism includes borrowing another’s ideas and representing them as my own.

3. To paraphrase the thoughts of another writer without acknowledgement is plagiarism.

4. Plagiarism also includes inadequate paraphrasing. Paraphrased passages (those put into my own words) have been properly acknowledged in the text and in the references.

5. Plagiarism includes using another person or organization to prepare this paper and then submitting it as my own work.

6. Plagiarism includes resubmitting my own previous work, in whole, or in part for a current assignment without the written consent of the current instructor.

Saint Leo University’s core value of integrity requires that students pledge to be honest, just, and consistent in word and deed. I fully understand what plagiarism is, and I further understand that if plagiarism is detected in my paper, my professor will follow the procedures for academic dishonesty set forth by Saint Leo University, the Donald R. Tapia College of Business and the Graduate Student Handbook.

Student Signature: Antionette Johnson


Many students across the world are striving hard at ensuring that they attain critical thinking and critical writing in their work. This is due to the fact that critical writing is considered to be primarily a key process regarding the evidencing as well as in the articulation of the aspect of critical thinking. As such, it is highly essential to attain the thinking part right. It entails attaining information as well as comprehensive understanding of the distinct approaches and utilizing them in writing (Brydges et al., 2021).

Personal definition of critical skills in doctoral writing

The most characteristic elements associated with critical thinking as well as writing from my personal definition is that they all need comprehensive as well as confident refusal to accept the presented conclusions regarding the other writers without in any way evaluating the key arguments as well as the evidence that they offer. I understand that it is also associated with the recognition of the key limitations of any study in one’s own evidence as well as argument and even conclusion (Brydges et al., 2021).


Critical writing needs powerful critical writing skills. I will use the knowledge attained on critical thinking as well as critical writing in my professional development to understand the given topic as well as issues. I will also use it to come up with an essay structure that will allow me to analyze distinct interpretations (Brydges et al., 2021).


Critical thinking as well as writing is essential in the analysis as well as the evaluation of information, often from various sources so as to come up with an argument. A mistake that is made by many writers is that they assume that each thing they read is true and do not evaluate it further.


Brydges, R., Boyd, V. A., Tavares, W., Ginsburg, S., Kuper, A., Anderson, M., & Stroud, L. (2021). Assumptions about competency-based medical education and the state of the underlying evidence: a critical narrative review. Academic Medicine, 96(2), 296-306.

error: Content is protected !!